Attention plz

Qanoon ki batein..

.سوال ........ اگر کوئی خاتون فیملی کورٹ سے تنسیخ نکاح کی ڈگری حاصل کرتی ہے ..مگر بعد اس کو احساس ہوتا ہے کے اسکا فیصلہ غلط تھا اور وہ دوبارہ شوہر کے ساتھ آباد ہونا چاہتی ہے تو کیا اس کے لیے اسے ہلا لہ کرنے کی ضرورت ہوگی ..
جواب ...
میرے مشاھدے میں یہ بات آی ھے کہ تنسیخ نکاح کی ڈگری لینے والی خواتین میں پچاس فیصد وھ خواتین ھوتی ھیں جو واقعی اپنے شوھر یا سسرال کے رویہ سے پریشان ھوتی ھیں مگر پچاس فیصد وھ خواتین ھوتی ھیں جو کسی شخص کے بہکاوے میں آکر شوھر سے طلاق لے لیتی ھیں کیونکہ اس شخص نے اس سے شادی کا وعدا کیا ھوتا ھے.مگر اکثر دیکھا گیا ھے کہ ایسے دوست خاتون کی پہلے شوھر سے تنسیخ کے بعد خاتون سے شادی کرنے سے مکر جاتے ھیں یوں وھ خاتون کسی کے بہکاوے میں آکر شوھر بھی کھو بیٹھتی ھے اور بند گلی.میں پہنچ جاتی ھے.اکثر پہلا شوھر اس کو اپنانے کو تیار ھوتا ھے مگر ان کے زھن میں ھوتا ھے کہ کیونکہ تنسیخ ھوچکی ھے اس لیے حلالہ کرنا پڑے گا..جو کہ غلط تصور ھوتا ھے.قراں پاک میں حلالہ.شوھر کی طلاق پر ھوتا ھے.فیملی کورٹ صرف نکاح کو منسوخ کرسکتی ھے.عورت کو طلاق دینے کا اختیار صرف شوھر کے پاس ھے.چنانچہ اگر شوھر نے طلاق نہھی دی.کورٹ نے صرف ڈگری دی ھے تو اسی شوھر سے دبارا نکاح ھوسکتا ھے.حلالہ کی ضرورت نہ ھے.اس اھم قانونی نقطہ پر آعلی عدالتی نظایر بھی موجود ھیں..ملاحظہ ھو..
Pld 2013 lah page 88

Pld 2014 fsc page 43

Kaanch ka glass gher men na rakhein jab bivi...

Joint Holdings...

JOINT HOLDINGS.

2016 CLC 550 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB
Ss. 135, 145 & 164---partition of joint holding ---On application for partition of joint holding , Naib Tehsildar, divided said holding in four Wandajat, which were accepted by Revenue of ficer Halqa/AC---Under S.145 of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, Instrument of partition (Sanad Taqseem) was also issued---No body having challenged said Wandajat, same had attained finality---Additional Commissioner, allowed respondent to choose his wanda, and ordered that other co-sharers, if aggrieved, could apply for partition and that wanda chosen by the respondent would remain intact---Validity---Additional Commissioner had not taken care of the rights of other co-sharers while passing the impugned order---Additional Commissioner had placed 51 Kanals, 8 Marlas land of respondent in one basket and all other co-sharers in the second basket---No justification existed to allow respondent to choose land of his choice out of total holding measuring 160 Kanals, 1 Marla---Additional Commissioner had made error in judgment and by doing so awarded relief, which was not even claimed by respondent---Additional Commissioner, had misused his authority and did not apply judicial mind---Such an order could not be allowed to be maintained, because it smacked fishy---Accepting petition, impugned order of Additional Commissioner, was set aside; in circumstances.
Citation Name : 2015 YLR 1617 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
S. 2(e), 15 & 22---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment petition---joint property owned by four owners---Portion of joint property in possession of tenant under rent agreement dated 5-12-1982 became property of landlord through partition decree passed in August, 2001---Grounds for eviction were default in payment of rent by tenant; bona fide personal need of premises by landlord; and expiry of term of 11 months of oral rent agreement in December, 2008---Tenant's plea in leave application that he had paid Rs. 40,000 as Pagri to co-owners under rent agreement dated 5-12-1982 and had not violated terms of tenancy agreement---Dismissal of leave application and acceptance of ejectment petition by Rent Tribunal upheld by Appellate Authority---Validity---Rent Tribunal while holding that tenancy between parties was regulated by rent agreement dated 5-12-1982 had erred in law by substituting landlord's plea, which was to the effect that after partition of joint property, he became owner of rented premises and he entered into oral tenancy agreement with tenant for 11 months---Pagri amount paid by tenant to joint owners was part of rent agreement dated 5-12-1982, but ejectment petition did not explain that who out of 4 joint owners became beneficiary thereof after partition of joint property---Rent Tribunal had failed to decide fate of Pagri amount, though he was legally bound to decide whether same was returnable to tenant or not at time of vacation of premises; and that who was responsible for its return---Rent Tribunal while deciding fate of "Pagri" would be liable to consider question as to whether its original amount was returnable or with addition of devaluation of currency as tenant was enhancing rent according to law---High Court set aside impugned judgments, granted leave application and remanded ejectment petition to Rent Tribunal for its decision after recording evidence of parties.
Citation Name : 2015 CLC 536 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
O. VII, R. 11 & S.141---Suit for possession through partition ---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Contention of defendants was that plaint did not disclose cause of action---Application for rejection of plaint was accepted concurrently---Validity---Only contents of plaint were to be considered while invoking provisions of O.VII, Rule 11, C.P.C. wherein cause of action was disclosed---Plaintiffs had a right to have a fair trial by producing evidence and to have a judicial opinion of the court on merits of case-

Dastan e gulab likhna...

How To Make Money Online In Pakistan In Urdu

after this interesting information if you want internet fields earning ways Article than just visit this website main home page and through make money category you can get different post that will fruitful for you.

Comments(3)

Ali Hassan

Bhai jaan me kaafi time se is chez ko dekh rha hun k net se paise kaise kamaate hain per muje abi tak aik cent ka b faida nai hua yaar ap help kar do taa k me kuch kma sakun thore hun ya ziada koi baat nai per hun to shi na

Reply
waqar

sir kisi subject pa b blog bania ja skta ha

Reply
- boota
  
  yes Create Blog according to your interest.
  
  Reply